Skip to Content
Free Consultation 201-574-7919

Privacy Rights for Warrantless Search in NJ


The New Jersey Supreme Court issued a ruling that reaffirmed the public's right to privacy in warrantless police searches of cars. The court ruled that police cannot search someone's property or belongings without a warrant unless "exigent circumstances" exist. Continue reading to learn more.

The Decision

The decision was based on Article I, Paragraph 7 of the New Jersey Constitution which provides greater protection against unreasonable searches and seizures than the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This means that even if police have probable cause to believe a vehicle contains contraband or evidence of criminal activity, they must obtain a warrant before searching it.

The ruling also overturned an earlier decision from 2009 that had broadened police authority to conduct warrantless car searches. The court found that in order for such searches to be permissible, the circumstances prompting them must be “unforeseeable and spontaneous.”

The ruling is an important reminder of the right to privacy and serves as a reminder that law enforcement must respect an individual’s civil liberties when conducting investigations. It is also an important victory for those who have been wrongfully accused of crimes and had their property searched without due process.

Understanding Search and Seizure

Search and seizure is a procedure used by law enforcement officers to gain evidence in order to ensure the arrest and prosecution of suspects. It is governed by the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which states that people have the right to be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures.

In order for a search or seizure to be considered lawful, it must be based on probable cause and must be conducted with a warrant from a judge. Law enforcement officers are also limited in what they can search and seize, as outlined in the Fourth Amendment.

Probable Cause

Probable cause is a crucial legal concept that plays a vital role in safeguarding citizens' rights while allowing law enforcement officers to perform their duties effectively. Essentially, it refers to the reasonable belief, based on factual evidence and circumstances, that a person has committed a crime or that a specific location contains evidence of criminal activity.

This standard of proof is required for police officers to obtain search warrants, make arrests, or conduct searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. By establishing probable cause, the justice system aims to strike a balance between an individual's right to privacy and protection from unlawful searches and the state's obligation to maintain public safety and order. It is important to note that probable cause does not guarantee guilt; rather, it serves as a preliminary measure to ensure that law enforcement actions are justified and grounded in objective facts.

Reasonable Suspicion

Reasonable suspicion is a legal standard that allows law enforcement officers to briefly detain and question an individual based on specific, articulable facts that suggest criminal activity may be afoot. This standard, which is lower than probable cause, serves as a critical tool for police officers to investigate potential crimes and maintain public safety while respecting citizens' rights.

Reasonable suspicion is often based on the officer's experience, training, and observations of the suspect's behavior, appearance, or other circumstances that seem out of the ordinary. For example, an officer might develop reasonable suspicion if they witness someone loitering near a closed business late at night or carrying items that appear to be stolen property.

It is important to note that reasonable suspicion alone does not permit law enforcement officers to conduct a full search or arrest a suspect; instead, it allows them to temporarily detain the person for further inquiry or a limited pat-down search for weapons, also known as a "stop and frisk." Ultimately, reasonable suspicion aims to balance the need for effective policing with the protection of individual liberties granted by the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

Key Takeaway

The right to privacy is protected by the U.S. Constitution and is now reinforced by the NJ legislature. By understanding the legal standards of probable cause and reasonable suspicion, as well as the protections granted by the Fourth Amendment, citizens can better advocate for their constitutional rights and hold law enforcement accountable for their actions.

As we continue to navigate the complexities of modern society, it is essential that we remain vigilant in safeguarding our liberties while also supporting the vital work of law enforcement agencies. By fostering open dialogue, promoting education, and encouraging collaboration between citizens and police, we can work towards a future where both individual freedoms and public security are upheld and respected.

If you believe you have been unlawfully searched, contact Law Offices of Joseph R. Donahue, LLC.

Share To: